I don't know what the point of that link is. But adducing who the morally superior side in a conflict is based on casualty rates implies ISIS, Nazi Germany, and the Confederates were the good guys. I'm not trying to simplify those wars but I don't know how to interpret such an argument except to mean that no party should defend itself if it has certain advantages over an enemy.
I don't know what the point of that link is. But adducing who the morally superior side in a conflict is based on casualty rates implies ISIS, Nazi Germany, and the Confederates were the good guys. I'm not trying to simplify those wars but I don't know how to interpret such an argument except to mean that no party should defend itself if it has certain advantages over an enemy.
I don't know what the point of that link is. But adducing who the morally superior side in a conflict is based on casualty rates implies ISIS, Nazi Germany, and the Confederates were the good guys. I'm not trying to simplify those wars but I don't know how to interpret such an argument except to mean that no party should defend itself if it has certain advantages over an enemy.